Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:29

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ryan Blaney hits right notes in Nashville, lands first Cup Series win of season - NASCAR.com
What’s next?
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
It turns out weather on other planets is a lot like on Earth - The Washington Post
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
6 million Chickens Dead and Counting - Daily Kos
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
If or when Taylor Swift publicly supports Harris & Walz, what will Republicans do?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Pediatrician Reveals 1 Food She Wants More Parents to Feed Kids - TODAY.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.